At one point in the roundtable meeting, he warned that the alternative to dialogue "is that a coup happens, which would mean uncalculated and hasty steps, including lots of irrationalities".When pressed by news editors to explain the comment, he said he did not mean a military coup but that "a force that is unprepared for rule" could ChronoSwiss Regulateur Dual Time CS-18 state institutions, said Amr Khafagi, editor-in-chief of the privately owned Shorouk daily, who attended the briefing.Response to Suleiman's statements was grim."He is threatening to impose martial law, which means everybody in the square will be smashed," said Abdul-Rahman Samir, a spokesman for a coalition of the five main youth groups behind protests in Tahrir Square.
"But what would he do with the rest of the 70 million Egyptians who will follow us afterward."Earlier on Tuesday, Suleiman said a plan was in place for the peaceful transfer of power, ChronoSwiss Regulateur Moonphase CS-17 included forming three committees -- one to propose constitutional amendments, another to oversee the implementation of the amendments and a third to investigate the violent clashes of February 2.Al Jazeera and agenciesThe FSA's announcement ChronoSwiss Regulateur Moonphase CS-20 greeted with widespread outrage. The headline in the Financial Times, for example, was, FSA's failure to punish Goodwin sparks anger. The newspaper reported the reactions of a number of people, including several lawyers.
One senior lawyer was reported to have said: "I find it very hard to believe that, given their findings of bad decisions, there still has been absolutely no one found at fault."It is true that all the members of the FSA's board are appointed by the Treasury and may be removed by the Treasury. It is also true that the FSA must submit a report at ChronoSwiss Time Master CS-15 once a year to the Treasury and that report must be laid before Parliament. And, of course, executives of the FSA do appear before the Treasury select committee to answer questions. But the FSA is not accountable for its performance either to the Treasury or to Parliament.If a Government minister, such as the Chancellor of the Exchequer, were answerable to Parliament for the FSA, it is likely the Chancellor and, if not he, Parliament, would have insisted on changes so that the FSA carried out its remit appropriately after
Commentaires
Il n'y a aucun commentaire sur cet article.